<b>HRAC Group 1</b> <font size='2'> (Legacy A) </font> resistant Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana from Iran

International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds

LOGIN | REGISTER
Friday, April 19, 2024

HRAC GROUP 1 (LEGACY A) RESISTANT STERILE OAT
(Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana)

Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase HRAC Group 1 (Legacy A)

Iran, Fars, Khuzestan, Golestan

INTRODUCTION		STERILE OAT
Sterile oat (Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana) is a monocot weed in the Poaceae family. In Iran this weed first evolved resistance to Group 1 (Legacy A) herbicides in 2006 and infests Canola, and Winter wheat. Group 1 (Legacy A) herbicides are known as Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase (Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase ). Research has shown that these particular biotypes are resistant to clodinafop-propargyl, diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-ethyl, haloxyfop-methyl, pinoxaden, sethoxydim, and tralkoxydim and they may be cross-resistant to other Group 1 (Legacy A) herbicides. The 'Group' letters/numbers that you see throughout this web site refer to the classification of herbicides by their site of action. To see a full list of herbicides and HRAC herbicide classifications click here.

QUIK STATS (last updated Apr 07, 2015 )
Common Name	Sterile oat
Species	Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana
Group	Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase HRAC Group 1 (Legacy A)
Herbicides	clodinafop-propargyl, diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-ethyl, haloxyfop-methyl, pinoxaden, sethoxydim, and tralkoxydim
Location	Iran, Fars, Khuzestan, Golestan
Year	2006
Situation(s)	Canola, and Winter wheat
Contributors - (Alphabetically)	Rouhollah Amini, Fatemeh Bena Kashani, Javid Gherekhloo, Hamid Sasanfar, and Eskandar Zand
Edit this Case \| Add New Case of Resistance \| Add Note

NOTES ABOUT THIS BIOTYPE

GENERAL

Javid Gherekhloo

Poster 248th ACS National Meeting and Exposition-San Fransisco-2014

Identifying and mapping wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Dur.) and little seed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.) resistant biotypes to clodinafop-propargyl in wheat fields of Kordkuy, Iran.

R. Kalami, J. Gherekhloo, B. Kamkar, E. Esfandiaripour and R. De Prado

Get PDF of Poster Here

Edit this Note | Add New Note

ACADEMIC ASPECTS

Confirmation Tests

Greenhouse, and Laboratory trials comparing a known susceptible Sterile oat biotype with this Sterile oat biotype have been used to confirm resistance. For further information on the tests conducted please contact the local weed scientists that provided this information.

Genetics

Genetic studies on HRAC Group 1 resistant Sterile oat indicate that the inheritance is determined by a two gene, dominant trait. There may be a note below or an article discussing the genetics of this biotype in the Fact Sheets and Other Literature

Mechanism of Resistance

Studies on the mechanism of resistance of Group 1 (Legacy A) resistant Sterile oat from Iran indicate that resistance is due to an altered target site, and enhanced metabolism. There may be a note below or an article discussing the mechanism of resistance in the Fact Sheets and Other Literature

Relative Fitness

There is no record of differences in fitness or competitiveness of these resistant biotypes when compared to that of normal susceptible biotypes. If you have any information pertaining to the fitness of Group 1 (Legacy A) resistant Sterile oat from Iran please update the database.

Edit Case | Add Note | Add Article | Add New Case | Help

CONTRIBUTING WEED SCIENTISTS

ROUHOLLAH AMINI

Assistant Professor Dr Agronomy And Plant Breeding Department Of Agronomy And Plant Breeding College Of Agriculture, University Of Tabriz, Tabriz. Post. Cod: 51666-16471. Iran. Tabriz, 51666-16471 Iran Email Rouhollah Amini

FATEMEH BENA KASHANI

M.s Student - Research Associate University Of Tehran Depart. Of Agriculture 100 City Pkwy Ste 700 Karaj, 16779-74583, Tehran Iran Email Fatemeh Bena Kashani

JAVID GHEREKHLOO

Associate Professor Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Agronomy Department 100 City Pkwy Ste 700 Gorgan, 49189-43464, Golestan Iran Email Javid Gherekhloo

HAMID SASANFAR

Research Associate University Of Tehran Weed Science Iran-Tehtan Tehran, 8787887896, Iran Iran Email Hamid Sasanfar

ESKANDAR ZAND

Weed Researcher Plant Peast & Deisease Research Institute Weed Research Department Plant Pest And Disease Research In 105 Kirkwood Dr Tehran, 19395, Iran Iran Email Eskandar Zand

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Herbicide Resistance Action Committee, The Weed Science Society of America, and weed scientists in Iran have been instrumental in providing you this information. Particular thanks is given to Rouhollah Amini, Fatemeh Bena Kashani, Javid Gherekhloo, Hamid Sasanfar, and Eskandar Zand for providing detailed information.

Drag a column header and drop it here to group by that column

Herbicide Resistant Sterile oat Globally
(Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana)

Country

FirstYear

Situation

Active Ingredients

Site of Action

Australia (New South Wales )

2002

Wheat

flamprop-methyl

Antimicrotubule mitotic disrupter ( HRAC Group 0 (Legacy Z)

Australia (South Australia)

2005

Wheat

iodosulfuron-methyl-Na

Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)

Australia (Queensland)

2006

Chickpea, Spring Barley, and Wheat

clodinafop-propargyl, and diclofop-methyl

Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase ( HRAC Group 1 (Legacy A)

Australia (New South Wales )

2018

Chickpea

glyphosate

Inhibition of Enolpyruvyl Shikimate Phosphate Synthase ( HRAC Group 9 (Legacy G)

France

1996

Wheat

fenoxaprop-ethyl

Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase ( HRAC Group 1 (Legacy A)

Iran

2006

Canola, and Winter wheat

clodinafop-propargyl, diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-ethyl, haloxyfop-methyl, pinoxaden, sethoxydim, and tralkoxydim

Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase ( HRAC Group 1 (Legacy A)

Iran

2009

Wheat

iodosulfuron-methyl-Na, and mesosulfuron-methyl

Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)

Iran

2010

Winter wheat

clodinafop-propargyl, iodosulfuron-methyl-Na, and mesosulfuron-methyl

Multiple Resistance: 2 Sites of Action
Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase ( HRAC Group 1 (Legacy A)
Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)

Specific Papers about this Case

Page size:

select

Page: of 1

Items 1 to 1 of 1

Kotoula-Syka, E. ; Afentouli, C. ; Georgoulas, I.. 2012. Herbicide-resistant weeds in cereal crops in Greece. : 157 - 161.

In Greece, diclofop-methyl was heavily used for grass weed control whereas chlorsulfuron was used for many years to control broad-leaf weeds in winter cereals. Recently, failures in control of several populations of major weeds were reported in Greece. The objectives of this research were to investigate the possibility of resistance evolution in various populations of Lolium rigidum, Phalaris brachistachys and Avena sterilis to grass herbicides and Papaver rhoeas to chlorsulfuron, and to elucidate the mechanisms of resistance. Plant response to these herbicides was evaluated in pot experiments and laboratory studies. We found that L. rigidum is multiple-resistant to ACCase inhibitors due to an altered target site, and to chlorsulfuron due to enhanced detoxification. Eight biotypes of P. brachystachys, were examined for resistance to ACCase inhibitors and seven of them indicated resistance to fenoxaprop-ethyl. In contrast all eight biotypes were susceptible to tralkoxydim and clodinafop-propargyl. Continuous use of isoproturon resulted in heavy infestation with A. sterilis that tolerates high rates of isoproturon while being susceptible to ACCase inhibitors used. A population of P. rhoeas was found to be resistant to chlosulfuron (altered target site), whereas all P. rhoeas populations were susceptible to imazamox and tolerant to imazapic but resistant plants were cross-resistant to imazethapyr..

Page size:

select

Page: of 1

Items 1 to 1 of 1

Literature about Similar Cases

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...

Page size:

select

Page: of 8

Items 1 to 5 of 39

Saeid Hassanpour-bourkheili, Javid Gherekhloo, Behnam Kamkar, S. Sanaz Ramezanpour. 2021. Mechanism and pattern of resistance to some ACCase inhibitors in winter
wild oat (Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana (Durieu) Gillet & Magne) biotypes
collected within canola fields. Crop Protection : 105541 - .

Due to the reports regarding unsuccessful control of Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana (Durieu) Gillet & Magne byhaloxyfop-R-methyl in canola fields, the following study was conducted to investigate the resistance of this weed to haloxyfop-R-methyl. Five out of 22 accessions were resistant to haloxyfop-R-methyl. These biotypes were then subjected to various rates of clodinafop propargyl, sethoxydim, pinoxaden and mesosulfuron methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl herbicides and their and cross-resistance to clodinafop propargyl and sethoxydim was confirmed. However, no resistance was observed to pinoxaden and mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron-methyl herbicides. Indirect study of metabolism by P450 using 1- aminobenzotriazole and piperonyl butoxide showed that this enzyme had no contribution to occurrence of resistance in the studied biotypes. Allele-specific PCR results indicated that Ile-2041-Asn mutation is responsible for resistance of A. sterilis subsp. ludoviciana biotypes, which was confirmed by sequencing of the samples. Since pinoxaden negatively affects canola, the growers face a serious limitation in their choice for chemical management and thus, implementation of integrated weed management such as introduction of row crops such as faba bean in crop rotation and increasing the diversity of herbicide mode of action by cultivation of crops such as sugar beet in crop rotation may prove helpful. In fields under canola-wheat rotation, it is also possible to use pinoxaden in wheat. Also, trifluralin, cycloxydim and clethodim herbicides may be tested on A. sterilis subsp. ludoviciana. This was the first case of A. sterilis subsp. ludoviciana resistance to ACCase inhibitors in canola fields..

Travlos, I. S.. 2013. Competition between accase-inhibitor resistant and susceptible sterile wild oat (Avena sterilis) biotypes. Weed Science 61 : 26 - 31.

Studies were conducted to determine the growth, fecundity, and competitive ability of an acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase)-inhibitor resistant (R) sterile wild oat biotype compared with a susceptible (S) biotype. Seed germination studies indicated that there were no differences in seed germination and seedling vigor between R and S biotypes at any temperature regime. R and S biotypes were grown under noncompetitive and competitive arrangement in the greenhouse. Under noncompetitive greenhouse conditions, growth of the R biotype was similar to that of the S biotype on the basis of plant height, canopy area, and plant biomass. Seed production and weight of R and S plants were also at the same levels. Furthermore, relative competitiveness among the R and S sterile wild oat biotypes was investigated by means of replacement series experiments. The R and S biotypes were compared under seven mixture proportions (6:0,5:1,4:2,3:3,2:4,1:5, and 0:6). No significant differences in competitive ability were observed between R and S biotypes on the basis of plant height, canopy area, or plant biomass. In most cases, relative crowding coefficient (RCC) values at 20, 60, and 100 d after transplanting (DAT) were close to one, indicating equal competitiveness between the R and S biotypes of wild oat used in this competitive study. However, in some cases, the RCC value was 1.31 for plant height, evident of a slight competitive advantage for the R biotype at 100 DAT. In general, ACCase-inhibitor R and S sterile wild oat biotypes were equally competitive, clearly without any growth penalty for R plants in either noncompetitive or competitive conditions..

Papapanagiotou, A. P. ; Kaloumenos, N. S. ; Eleftherohorinos, I. G.. 2012. Sterile oat (Avena sterilis L.) cross-resistance profile to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Greece. Crop Protection 35 : 118 - 126.

Sterile oat (Avena sterilis) is the most widely distributed, abundant and harmful weed in the winter cereals grown in Greece. Its effective control has relied for the past three decades upon the ACCase-inhibiting herbicides. However, recently many growers in northern and central Greece have experienced reduced sterile oat control after the application of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl or clodinafop-propargyl. Preliminary screening indicated that less than 80% of the treated plants in 36 and 43 out of 125 sterile oat accessions were killed (R, resistant) by the application of the four times the recommended dose of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (R-Fx) or clodinafop-propargyl (R-Cd), whereas less than 80% of the treated plants in 29 of them were killed by both herbicides applied at four times the recommended dose. Also, more than 80% of the treated plants in 42 and 35 accessions were killed by the four times the recommended dose (r, partially resistant) of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (r-Fx) or clodinafop-propargyl (r-Cd), respectively. Finally, more than 80% of the treated plants in 47 and 47 accessions were killed (S, susceptible) by the recommended dose of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (S-Fx) or clodinafop-propargyl (S-Cd), respectively, whereas more than 80% of the treated plants in 36 of these accessions were killed by the recommended dose of both herbicides. The whole-plant dose-response method used to evaluate 17 R-Fx and five S-Fx accessions showed that 16, 17, 11, and two R-Fx accessions were cross-resistant to clodinafop-propargyl, diclofop-methyl, tralkoxydim, and pinoxaden, respectively. In particular, more than 50% of the treated plants in 12, 12, 17, and three accessions survived the respective application of the four times the recommended dose of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, clodinafop-propargyl, diclofop-methyl, and tralkoxydim. Regarding pinoxaden, 3, 17 and 20% of the treated plants in three accessions survived its application at four times the recommended dose. All R and the S accessions were effectively controlled by the recommended dose of imazamox and mesosulfuron-methyl+iodosulfuron methyl-sodium. These results strongly suggest that cross-resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides has been developed for sterile oat. Therefore, measures should be taken for crop rotation when possible or rotational use of the available ALS- and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in order to reduce the potential for development of sterile oat multiple resistance. Regarding the accessions with cross-resistance to APP, CHD and PPZ, these could be effectively controlled by the application of mesosulfuron-methyl+iodosulfuron methyl-sodium..

Tursun, N.. 2012. Determination on a quick test of herbicide resistance to fenoxaprop-p-ethyl in sterile oat (Avena sterilis L.) in cereal crops. TABAD, Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 5 : 161 - 166.

Sterile oat (Avena sterilis L.) is a major grass weed in cereals in Turkey. Study was determined for quick-test of herbicide resistance to fenoxaprop-p-ethyl in sterile oat (Avena sterilis L.) in a laboratory setting. The experimental design was a randomized plot design with five replications in Petri dishes. Seeds were germinated on 1.3% agar medium whit different proportions hormone (GA3). Then, fenoxaprop-p-ethyle nuron-methyl was added 0 (control), 7.68, 15.36, 30.72, 61.44, 122.88 and 243.76 µM to this solution with. Twenty milliliters of this medium were poured into each Petri dish. Ten seeds were placed into each Petri dish. At the end of study, root and shoot were measured sterile oat seed which germinated and dose-response curves were determined. As a result, it was determined point in time whether herbicides resistance against weeds in a field..

Travlos, I. S. ; Giannopolitis, C. N. ; Economou, G.. 2011. Diclofop resistance in sterile wild oat (Avena sterilis L.) in wheat fields in Greece and its management by other post-emergence herbicides. Crop Protection 30 : 1449 - 1454.

In 2009, a survey was conducted of cereal fields in five prefectures of Greece to establish the frequency and distribution of herbicide-resistant sterile wild oat (Avena sterilis L.). In total, 104 sterile wild oat accessions were collected and screened in a field experiment (conducted in 2009 and repeated in 2010) with several herbicides commonly used to control this weed. Most of the sterile wild oat accessions (89%) were classed as resistant (or developing resistant) to the ACCase-inhibiting herbicide diclofop, while resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides was markedly lower. The results of the pot experiments showed that some of the sterile wild oat accessions were found to have a very high level of diclofop resistance (resistance index up to 28.6), while cross-resistance with other herbicides was common. The levels of resistance and cross-resistance patterns varied among biotypes with different amount and time of selection pressure, indicating either more than one mechanism of resistance or different resistance mutations in these sterile wild oat biotypes. LA14, which had the highest diclofop resistance level (28.6 resistance index), showed resistance to all APP herbicides applied and non-ACCase inhibitors. Alternative ACCase-inhibiting herbicides, namely tralkoxydim and pinoxaden remain effective on 86 and 92% of the tested sterile wild oat populations, respectively. For the ALS-inhibiting herbicide mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron, nearly all the sterile wild oat accessions were susceptible (97%), with only 3 of them classed as developing resistance. Therefore, there is an opportunity to effectively control sterile wild oat by selecting from a wide range of herbicides and other cultural practices. Early post-emergence herbicide application is strongly suggested, since it could decrease the number of resistant seeds in the field and slow down the dispersal of this major problem..

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...

Page size:

select

Page: of 8

Items 1 to 5 of 39

PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FIRST if you intend to base a significant portion of a scientific paper on data derived from this site.
Cite this site as: Heap, I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Online. Internet. Friday, April 19, 2024 . Available www.weedscience.org
Copyright © 1993- 2024 WeedScience.org All rights reserved. Fair use of this material is encouraged. Proper citation is requested.