International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds

Countries Weeds Herbicides Mutations Graphs References Researchers
HRAC GROUP 2 (LEGACY B) RESISTANT CATCHWEED BEDSTRAW
(Galium aparine)


Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)

Austria
INTRODUCTION CATCHWEED BEDSTRAW
Catchweed Bedstraw (Galium aparine) is a dicot weed in the Rubiaceae family.  In Austria this weed first evolved resistance to Group 2 (Legacy B) herbicides in 2024 and infests Sugar beets.   Group 2 (Legacy B) herbicides are known as Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase (Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ).  Research has shown that these particular biotypes are resistant to nicosulfuron and they may be cross-resistant to other Group 2 (Legacy B) herbicides.

The 'Group' letters/numbers that you see throughout this web site refer to the classification of herbicides by their site of action. To see a full list of herbicides and HRAC herbicide classifications click here.

If we do not have a picture for this weed, or you can provide a better picture (scan, digital camera etc) please please e-mail it to us.

QUIK STATS (last updated Feb 08, 2026 )

Common NameCatchweed Bedstraw
SpeciesGalium aparine
GroupInhibition of Acetolactate Synthase HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)
Herbicidesnicosulfuron
LocationAustria
Year2024
Situation(s)Sugar beets
Contributors - (Alphabetically)Wibke Imgenberg, Dagmar Rissel, and Lena Ulber 
Edit this Case  |  Add New Case of Resistance  |  Add Note

NOTES ABOUT THIS BIOTYPE

GENERAL

Report of a Galium aparine biotype with resistance to nicosulfuron from Austria  
  1. Year, location and crop where the seeds were collected The resistant Galium aparine biotype (hereinafter referred to as GALAP-R) was collected from a field near St. Valentin (Austria) grown with an ALS-tolerant sugar beet cultivar (Conviso Smart). In the field, a splitting application of the maximum registered dose rate of Conviso® One (2 x 0.5 L ha-1 Conviso® One; 50 g L-1 foramsulfuron + 30 g L-1 thiencarbazone; Bayer CropScience) at an interval of 19 days had provided inadequate control of G. aparine in spring 2024. Herbicide resistance was suspected since ALS herbicides have been frequently applied in the crop rotation in the three previous years. Seeds from surviving G. aparine plants were collected from the field before harvest of the sugar beets in August 2024. A known susceptible G. aparine population (hereinafter referred to as GALAP-S) was continuously propagated in the “weed garden” at the Julius Kühn-Institute in Braunschweig (Germany) without any herbicide treatment. GALAP-S served as the herbicide-susceptible reference biotype.   

  2. Materials and Methods
    Dose-response bioassay and ALS gene analysis Seeds of the GALAP-R and GALAP-S biotype, respectively, were stratified in a cold room at 4°C for 12 days. Afterwards the seeds were germinated in germination trays on potting soil in a climate cabinet at 20°C/10°C with a 16 h light period for 10 days until the seedlings were ready for transplanting. Germinated seedlings of similar growth stage were transplanted into pots (8x8 cm) containing a standardized soil (50% sand, 38% silty loam, 12.2% clay) with four seedlings per pot and four replicates (pots) per herbicide dose rate. When the first leaf whorl was developed, the plants were sprayed with nicosulfuron (40 g L-1, trade name: Stretch, Agraria SA, Bulgaria) at dose rates adjusted to the nicosulfuron sensitivity of each biotype (Table 1). The herbicide was applied with the use of a movingnozzle cabinet sprayer equipped with a flat-fan nozzle tip (TeeJet 8002EVS, TeeJet Technologies GmbH, Ludwigsburg, Germany) calibrated to deliver 300 L ha-1 of spray solution at 210 kPa in a single pass over the foliage. For the dose-response analysis, nicosulfuron was chosen instead of foramsulfuron + thiencarbazone (Conviso One) as a herbicide since it has been applied to GALAP-R before in the field. In addition, it contains only one active which eases interpretation of the dose-response results. After herbicide treatment, plants were maintained in a growth cabinet 16 h light with 206-208 μmolm−2 s−1 and 8 h dark periods at a temperature of 20 °C/10 °C. Plant survival and shoot fresh weight per pot were recorded 18 days after herbicide treatment. Plants with new green leaf tissue were considered as survivors. The mean fresh weight was expressed as a percentage of the untreated control. The GR50 (herbicide dose to reduce biomass by 50%) and relative standard errors for the mean percentage fresh weight were calculated using non-linear regression analysis and the R software (drc add-on package), the fourparameter log-logistic model was fitted to the data and GR50 values were estimated for both biotypes. A resistance index (RI) was calculated as ratio between the GR50 of the GALAP-R population with the corresponding GR50 of the susceptible GALAP-S biotype.  Table 1. Dose rates of nicosulfuron (40 g L-1, trade name: Stretch, Agraria SA, Bulgaria) applied to the two GALAP biotypes. The registered dose rate of nicosulfuron in Germany is 40 g ha-1. Biotype   nicosulfuron dose (g ha-1) GALAP-R 0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640 GALAP-S 0, 0.652, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40   For ALS gene sequence analysis, DNA was extracted from four plants of GALAP-R surviving the full registered dose treatment of 40 g ha-1 nicosulfuron and 2 plants of GALAP-S for reference using the InviSorb® Spin Plant Mini Kit (Invitek Diagnostics, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Partial ALS gene was amplified using self-designed primers covering most of the ALS gene sequence and Q5 High Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, USA). PCR was performed as follows: 5 min at 95°C, 37 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 62°C, 30 s at 72°C and 2 min at 72°C. PCR product size was confirmed by gel electrophoresis. Subsequent attempts of commercial Sanger sequencing failed, potentially due to the polyploid nature of G. aparine. Therefore, PCR products were sent to commercial amplicon sequencing using Oxford Nanopore technology (ONT, Microsynth Seqlab, Switzerland). A bioinformatic pipeline was run to map and cluster the sequencing results according to the reference sequence GU377313.1 provided by NCBI.  Sequence comparisons between GALAP-R and the reference sequence were performed on CLC main workbench (Qiagen, Denmark).  

    3. Results
    The dose-response study confirmed resistance to nicosulfuron in the GALAP-R biotype. The GALAP-R biotype had a GR50 of 150.6 g ha-1 nicosulfuron, while the GR50 of the GALAP-S biotype was 16.6 g ha-1, making GALAP-R nine-fold more resistant than the susceptible GALAP-S biotype (Figure 1, Table 2).     Figure 1. Dose-response curves (biomass relative to the untreated control, %) for GALAP-S (solid) and GALAP-R (dashed) biotypes of Galium aparine treated with nicosulfuron.    Table 2. Estimated GR50 (herbicide dose to reduce biomass by 50%) and resistance index (RI) values for Galium aparine biotypes treated with nicosulfuron (40 g L-1, trade name: Stretch, Agraria SA, Bulgaria). Values in parentheses are standard errors.  Biotype GR50 (L ha-1) RI GALAP-R 150.6 (11.17) 9.072 GALAP-S 16.6 (8.24)     Amplicon sequencing using ONT sequencing technology revealed a G to T substitution in the second nucleotide of the codon coding for Trp574 leading to a Trp574Leu substitution in the ALS protein (Figure 2). This substitution was found in two out of four identified ALS genes in GALAP-R Figure 2. Comparison of partial ALS gene sequences of GALAP-R to the reference sequence GU377313.1 provided in the NCBI database.    

Contributors
Dagmar Rissel Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland Messeweg 11-12 38104 Braunschweig Germany E-Mail: dagmar.rissel@julius-kuehn.de  

Lena Ulber Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland Messeweg 11-12 38104 Braunschweig Germany E-Mail: lena.ulber@julius-kuehn.de  

Wibke Imgenberg Agrana Research & Innovation Center GmbH Josef-Reither-Strasse 21-23 3430 Tulln Austria E-Mail: wibke.imgenberg@agrana.com    

Edit this Note  |  Add New Note
 

ACADEMIC ASPECTS

Confirmation Tests

Greenhouse trials comparing a known susceptible Catchweed Bedstraw biotype with this Catchweed Bedstraw biotype have been used to confirm resistance. For further information on the tests conducted please contact the local weed scientists that provided this information.
 
Genetics

Genetic studies on HRAC Group 2 resistant Catchweed Bedstraw have not been reported to the site.  There may be a note below or an article discussing the genetics of this biotype in the Fact Sheets and Other Literature
 
Mechanism of Resistance

Studies on the mechanism of resistance of Group 2 (Legacy B) resistant Catchweed Bedstraw from Austria indicate that resistance is due to an altered target site.  There may be a note below or an article discussing the mechanism of resistance in the Fact Sheets and Other Literature
 
Relative Fitness

There is no record of differences in fitness or competitiveness of these resistant biotypes when compared to that of normal susceptible biotypes.  If you have any information pertaining to the fitness of Group 2 (Legacy B) resistant Catchweed Bedstraw from Austria please update the database.
 
Edit Case  |  Add Note  |  Add Article  |  Add New Case  |  Help

CONTRIBUTING WEED SCIENTISTS

WIBKE IMGENBERG
Projectmanager
Agrana Research & Innovation Center GmbH
Agricultural Research
Josef-Reither-Strasse 21-23
Tulln an der Donau, 3430, Lower Austria
Austria
Email Wibke Imgenberg
DAGMAR RISSEL
Projectmanager
Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants
Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland
Messeweg 11-12
Braunschweig, 38104, Brunswick
Germany
Email Dagmar Rissel
LENA ULBER
Projectmanager
Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants
Institute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland
Messeweg 11-12
Braunschweig, 38104, Brunswick
Germany
Email Lena Ulber

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Herbicide Resistance Action Committee, The Weed Science Society of America, and weed scientists in Austria have been instrumental in providing you this information. Particular thanks is given to Wibke Imgenberg, Dagmar Rissel, and Lena Ulber for providing detailed information.
Herbicide Resistant Catchweed Bedstraw Globally
(Galium aparine)
Herbicide Resistant Catchweed Bedstraw Globally
(Galium aparine)
Drag a column header and drop it here to group by that column
Herbicide Resistant Catchweed Bedstraw Globally
(Galium aparine)
#CountryFirstYearSituationActive IngredientsSite of Action
1 AustriaAustria 2024 Sugar beets nicosulfuron 2 Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)
272Galium aparineCatchweed Bedstraw33284
2 ChinaChina 2007 Winter wheat tribenuron-methyl 9 Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)
272Galium aparineCatchweed Bedstraw5607
3 ChinaChina 2014 Wheat fluroxypyr 9 Auxin Mimics ( HRAC Group 4 (Legacy O)
272Galium aparineCatchweed Bedstraw10952
4 IranIran 2016 Wheat 2,4-D, and MCPA 79 Auxin Mimics ( HRAC Group 4 (Legacy O)
272Galium aparineCatchweed Bedstraw16083
5 IranIran 2017 Wheat tribenuron-methyl 79 Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)
272Galium aparineCatchweed Bedstraw15064
6 IranIran 2017 Wheat 2,4-D, iodosulfuron-methyl-Na, MCPA, mesosulfuron-methyl, sulfosulfuron, and tribenuron-methyl 79 Multiple Resistance: 2 Sites of Action
Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)
Auxin Mimics ( HRAC Group 4 (Legacy O)
272Galium aparineCatchweed Bedstraw17138
7 TurkeyTurkey 2008 Winter wheat chlorsulfuron, iodosulfuron-methyl-Na, mesosulfuron-methyl, thifensulfuron-methyl, triasulfuron, and tribenuron-methyl 71 Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)
272Galium aparineCatchweed Bedstraw7814
Literature about Similar Cases

Page size:
select
Page: of 4
Items 1 to 5 of 18

Page size:
select
Page: of 4
Items 1 to 5 of 18
PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FIRST if you intend to base a significant portion of a scientific paper on data derived from this site.
Cite this site as: Heap, I.  The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds.  Online.  Internet.  Friday, March 13, 2026 .  Available  www.weedscience.org
Copyright © 1993- 2026 WeedScience.org All rights reserved. Fair use of this material is encouraged. Proper citation is requested.